I’ve been reading Ruchir’s articles on FT for many years and I don’t think he’s a Trump loving right winger. He’s been sounding off on deficit spending for many years now.SAPPORO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 9:17 amThere's nothing in the video that suggests that Ruchir is NOT a right leaning economist. There's nothing other than indiscriminate layoffs that T has done to reduce deficits that Ruchir was going ga-ga over it. This is why I am guessing that he was alluding to the staff reduction - even if the entire federal workforce is laid off it would be a drop in the bucket!nodegree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:32 pmI watched the interview and I don't think Ruchir blamed it solely on the Biden administration. He blamed recent administrations (my understanding is likely since 2017 or even 2013) for running up the deficits so high. Obviously the current Debt to GDP ratio of over 120% is just not sustainable.SAPPORO wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 2:02 pm Trump is Trump but I see a remarkable shift in the perspectives of the other countries. During the first term T tariff threats were considered to be empty threats with the end-game of making deals (which could have been done more amicably anyways without the threats). But now, everyone knows T is a bully in bad faith and no one wants to negotiate with him. So, the trade war is in full swing.
There are no winners in Tariffs. One cannot compare India's import taxes on Benz cars to tariffs on everyday items consumed by average Americans Tariffs started the great depression about a hundred years ago. Maybe Trump wants to be part of two 100-year events to etch his name forever in history books, pandemic and a great depression!
Not sure what Ruchir means by recent govt spending. If he is referring to govt hiring, it must be based on easily debunked fake news that Biden increased the federal workforce by 50% when in fact it was by 5%. https://www.statesman.com/story/news/po ... 187967007/
I am pretty sure that laying off thousands of government employees and passing the savings on to millionaire as tax cuts, would definitely hurt the average American looking for services from the govt. What T is doing has to be undone and will be by someone else and it's going to cost hell a lot more. Imagine reacquiring federal building sold to Trump org. Raegan fired 11k air-traffic controllers back in 1981 and we are still playing catch-up!
If Ruchir were non-partisan and actually concerned about the deficits, he should have at least brought up the tax cuts that are going to be passed as if it costs nothing while in fact it would add at least $4 Trillion to the deficits!
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2 ... e-00230023
If you read his past articles on FT he’s quite critical of TCJA when deficit is running high.